Select the Out-Of-City Appraiser: New Social Science Investigation on Real Estate Expert Witness


This paper adds to the literature on the variety of the true property appraisal skilled witness. The current appraisal professional witness selection literature suggests that when the out-of-city professional witness overshadows the information and knowledge of the regional specialist, the out-of-city expert is the obvious selection yet most lawyers base their appraiser choice on elements that are irrelevant to profitable the case this sort of as comfort, proximity to their workplace, proximity to the subject property, a client’s suggestion or the expert’s cost. The benefits of this two-portion social science study research reveal that in conditions in which there will be contentious valuation problems or, the place the appraisal specialist witness will be named upon to criticize the operate of the opposing appraiser, it could be in the best desire of the client and final result of the circumstance to choose an appraisal specialist who is located outside of the appraisal providers spot of the opposing appraiser.

immobilieninvestor to the Paper

Following almost twenty five years as a actual home valuation specialist witness, this creator has noticed that, in the greater part of actual estate litigation instances, attorneys normally pick their appraisal professional from in the common vicinity of the topic house. However, this follow is opposite to the literature on the skilled witness assortment method that does not address the spot or geographic proximity of the skilled to the matter property as a related situation (e.g., Couture and Hayes, 2010 Fried, 2008 Tirella, 2006 Strutlin, 1996 Cabaniss, 1997 Bremser and Mathis, 1994 Harrell, 1993 Champagne et al., 1991 Jones, 1955).

This paper explores the causes why numerous legal professionals choose a “regional” appraiser and specifics powerful new investigation suggesting that, at minimum for critical or higher price situations, lawyers ought to appear to the greatest appraisal skilled witness from beyond the common geographic area of the matter property and the opposing valuation specialist.

Widespread Rational for Hiring the “Nearby” Appraiser

A assessment of the appraisal professional witness assortment literature suggests a minimal variety of cases from the secondary literature (e.g., non-peer-reviewed or journal good quality) where the employing of a “nearby” appraiser is suggested. The causes for picking the local appraisal skilled witness include:

• Value financial savings
• Comfort and ease of assembly/communication
• Consumer feels comfy with and/or has formerly employed their local specialist
• Information of microeconomic problems, and previous trends in the region as a basis for viewpoints about foreseeable future market place conditions and
• Where a jury will be affected by in which the specialist resides, grew up or went to university.

A generally said disadvantage of an out-of-city professional is the included cost of journey. Nevertheless, “the value can be well worth it… when the faraway witness fully overshadows opposing counsel’s local expert” (p. 567).

Another drawback, when the out-of-city professional is also a more distinguished skilled with better credentials, are higher fees. The legal professional should consider this functional thought in the context of what expenses the client can fairly bear, how extended the motion is probably to run and the expected use of the witness.,

In cases exactly where the neighborhood appraiser/skilled is a client’s advice, the lawyer need to evaluate whether or not the client’s tips is based on a want to throw a good friend some organization and/or desires to retain the services of the professional (irrespective of skills) most likely to favor the interests of the consumer due to the fact of individual or financial ties. Haig’s (2011) guidance to counsel on likely alongside with the client-chosen expert is:

“Don’t forget, it is the legal professional to whom the shopper will very likely give credit history or blame for the outcome of the litigation. As repeatedly observed, the skilled often plays a significant-if not the essential-position in the litigation approach. Appropriately, there are no substitutes for an attorney carrying out his personal owing diligence concerning a proposed specialist and for an legal professional partaking in very clear communications with the client relating to the professionals and negatives of any proposed expert” (p. 563).

Even though not explicitly said in the literature on the cost savings of a regional professional, the out-of-city appraisal skilled could need to have further time and linked costs to comply with the Competency Rule of the Uniform Expectations of Skilled Appraisal Practice (USPAP) (2014-2015), specifically:

(a) compliance with rules and regulations that implement to the appraiser these kinds of as the State’s appraisal licensing legislation and

(b) “in which geographic competency is essential, an appraiser who is not familiar with the pertinent market place characteristics need to purchase an comprehending necessary to make credible assignment results for the specific property type and market place associated” (p. U-11).

Referring in this part solely to USPAP’s geographic competency, the Federal Rule of Proof 702 calls for that “scientific, technological or other specialised expertise will assist the trier of simple fact,” and in that circumstance, (b) “a witness experienced as an professional by knowledge, talent, experience, or schooling, could testify thereto in the sort of an viewpoint or otherwise… ” Rule 702 was amended in 2000 with the addition of a “dependability” component. Beneath Rule 702 as amended, a experienced witness might only give professional testimony “if (one) the testimony is based on sufficient specifics or information, (two) the testimony is the merchandise of trustworthy principles and strategies, and (three) the witness has applied the ideas and approaches reliably to the details of the situation.” Consequently, for the appraiser professional, the problem of geographic competence as it relates to Rule 702 has a few elements: regardless of whether the appraiser competently deemed the relevant marketplace attributes, whether or not the skilled testimony is “based on sufficient specifics or knowledge,” and whether the expert has “used the rules and strategies [she employed] reliably to the specifics of the circumstance.”

No matter whether the appraisal professional happy the aspects of geographic competence will be decided as a precondition for admissibility. Nonetheless, in most circumstances the troubles will go with the weight of the evidence instead of admissibility.

Acquiring geographic competency will not be an situation for the far more seasoned/distinguished out-of-city professional who will be completed in knowing the marketplace traits related to the valuation troubles.


The most comprehensive literature on appraisal expert witness variety does not advocate the selection of an expert witness to be geographically proximate to the subject property. Nevertheless, the standard lawyer favors the “regional” appraisal professional with the rationale being 1 or much more of price minimization, legal professional usefulness, client desire and prior knowledge of the subject’s neighborhood or market.

There will be moments when price necessitates the hiring of a regional appraisal skilled. Additionally, there will be cases the place an appraisal specialist is required but, because valuation is not the disputed situation, any further expense for a non-neighborhood or far better certified skilled is not justified.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here